Tag Archives: Utopia

Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners: Toward Sociability

The Power of Nonviolence Writings by Advocates of PeaceThe eleventh chapter of The Power of Nonviolence: Writings by Advocates of Peace  contains Albert Camus 1946 essay Neither Victims nor Executioners. This week we discuss the last part of the essay, Toward Sociability. Camus wrote this 16-page essay as World War II had just ended, and it seemed as if the Soviet Union and the United States were dragging the planet into the horrors of a third world war. Eleven years later, he would win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

Before anyone gets distracted by sociability being a homophone for socialism, this section is about being in conversation. If you have followed along with the prior posts discussing the the earlier section of this essay, then you know that Camus equally discards capitalism and socialism as being murderously Utopian — or Dystopian.

Camus steps away from the cold logic of his argument to dicsuss the place of emotion.  He finds that emotions has a place as a motivating force, but not to the effect that it distorts the goals of a nonviolent society:

But I should not want to leave the impression, in concluding, that any programme for the future can get along without our powers of love and indignation.

Camus reinforces the choice between the current murderous world and a world where killing is not acceptable.  He understands that there is a cost to being a pcifist in a world where killing is the norm:

I think that I must speak out, that I must state that I will never again be one of those, whoever they be, who compromise with murder, and that I must take the consequences of such a decision.

Camus does not leave out any nation or political system in his condemnation, but he refuses to falling into the rap of hating any particular people or nation.  He turns his energy toward the attitudes that we must avoid and those that we must support: Continue reading Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners: Toward Sociability

Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners: A New Social Contract

The Power of Nonviolence Writings by Advocates of PeaceThe eleventh chapter of The Power of Nonviolence: Writings by Advocates of Peace  contains Albert Camus 1946 essay Neither Victims nor Executioners. This week we discuss the seventh part of the essay, A New Social Contract. Camus wrote this 16-page essay as World War II had just ended, and it seemed as if the Soviet Union and the United States were dragging the planet into the horrors of a third world war. Eleven years later, he would win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

The social contract that Camus is referring to was most famously discussed by Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau.  The social contract is thought to be the terms on which the people consent to be governed.  This discussion profoundly influenced the US Declaration of Independence.  Continue reading Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners: A New Social Contract

Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners: The World Speeds Up

The Power of Nonviolence Writings by Advocates of PeaceThe eleventh chapter of The Power of Nonviolence: Writings by Advocates of Peace  contains Albert Camus 1946 essay Neither Victims nor Executioners. This week we discuss the sixth part of the essay, The World Speeds Up. Camus wrote this 16-page essay as World War II had just ended, and it seemed as if the Soviet Union and the United States were dragging the planet into the horrors of a third world war. Eleven years later, he would win the Nobel Prize for Literature.

As the title of this section suggests, Camus looks at how the speed of innovation is increasingly outpacing its being put into practice.  He gives examples from the recent wars and political systems putting into place ideas of a generation, or century, past: Continue reading Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners: The World Speeds Up

Albert Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners: The Self-Deception of Socialists

The Power of Nonviolence Writings by Advocates of PeaceThe eleventh chapter of The Power of Nonviolence: Writings by Advocates of Peace contains Albert Camus‘ 1946 essay Neither Victims nor Executioners. This week we discuss the third part of the essay, Saving Our Skins. Camus wrote this 16-page essay as World War II had just ended, and it seemed as if the Soviet Union and the United States were dragging the planet into the horrors of a third world war. Eleven years later, he would win the Nobel prize for literature.

Though Camus goes into a lot of detail about the players in the Socialist Party’s rise in France at the time, this section is really not about Socialists.  Camus is more interested in the reaction of people when they are faced with the choice of committing the violence inherent in their philosophy.  As Camus states:

I have chosen this example not to score off the Socialists but to illustrate the paradoxes among which we live. To score off the Socialists, one would have to be superior to them. This is not yet the case.

Camus saw the Socialist having to make the choice of all ideologues.  The first path is deciding that the ends justify the means so that murder is justified.  The second path is to proclaim that ideology is not a justification for murder. Camus described what happens when the second path is chosen:

If the second, they will exemplify the way our period marks the end of ideologies, that is, of absolute Utopias which destroy themselves, in history, by the price they ultimately exact. It will then be necessary to choose a most modest and less costly Utopia. At least it is in these terms that the refusal to legitimise murder forces us to pose the problem.

Related articles

Saving Our Skins: Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners

The Power of Nonviolence Writings by Advocates of PeaceThe eleventh chapter of The Power of Nonviolence: Writings by Advocates of Peace contains Albert Camus‘ 1946 essay Neither Victims nor Executioners. This week we discuss the second part of the essay, Saving Our Skins. Camus wrote this 16-page essay as World War II had just ended, and it seemed as if the Soviet Union and the United States were dragging the planet into the horrors of a third world war. Eleven years later, he would win the Nobel prize for literature. This week we discuss the second part of the essay.

The title of this section comes from the conclusion of the first section that we must refuse to either to kill or be killed.  This launches the discussion of the accusations that Camus is living in a Utopia because so-called political reality calls for murder. He finds the ease with which his accusers call for murder is “a freak of the times” where the accusers are disassociated from the actuality of what they are calling for.  Camus describes how the whole culture is disassociated from reality:

We make love by telephone, we work not on matter but on machines, and we kill and are killed by proxy. We gain in cleanliness, but lose in understanding.

This poetically describes the evil of our current world where we execute innocent children by drones operated by someone half way across the globe.  Continue reading Saving Our Skins: Camus’ Neither Victims nor Executioners